The need to combine the two skillsets of digital technologies and urban infrastructure means the smart city talent pool is limited. Good hires require extensive search and the direct approach.
Hiring the right talent remains the number one concern of executive boards and the main challenge when it comes to expanding into new verticals or markets in the smart city sector.
Based on the 2020 State of Talent Optimisation report by the Predictive Index, around half (49 per cent) of last year’s hires were qualified as “good hires”. Today, on average, only a third of job vacancies are filled through internal promotions.
It is even less in new sectors such as smart cities as most players move from hardware-driven urban infrastructure into software, electronics and Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies that require new skillsets and business models.
Internal HR still finds it challenging to put customised training in place. And hires from direct competition can be risky as candidates are often tied into non-competition clauses. Competitors could also become project partners at some stage.
Few applicants respond to online job advertisements or LinkedIn posts in the sector and, when they do, often do not have the required set of skills and experience. Good hires for smart cities require extensive search and a direct approach through different means, including an active talent community to reach out to. Once a qualified pool of talents is identified and approached, our experience also shows that the level of candidates’ responses is generally low but also varies according to countries.
We deal with more qualified candidates showing interest in Spain, Portugal or Italy than, for instance, in the Netherlands, Belgium or Germany. France sits somewhere in the middle. Not surprisingly, the level of response is slightly better for sales-related roles compared to purely technical ones as sales profiles are more likely to engage in a conversation but they are often not considering a career move immediately. The level of candidate response is also slightly higher in fast-moving and less regulated labour markets such as in the US, the UK or Singapore.
Strategic roles, difficult-to-fill positions or new jobs need to be filled with more attention and require more steps in the process. After years of experience, my conclusion is that two factors are key in predicting a good hire and future success in the role: past performance in a similar role and industry and the behaviour match with the tasks required in the job.
The reality is, though, that even a sales manager’s role can be completely different whether you are in a SME or a large multinational corporation, or whether you are handling key accounts directly or animating indirect sales channels, or whether you are hunting new verticals or markets, bringing in new solutions or upselling and farming existing accounts, and whether you are selling mainly to the private sector or the public sector. It often comes down to the candidate’s experience in global B2B technology sales, therefore, and their ability to co-design end-to-end solutions with clients and to secure sale outcomes and a return on investment (ROI).
In the smart cities industry, past performances are mainly evaluated by the type and the size of projects sold and deployed and the precise role that the candidate has played in the whole process. As hard as it sounds, experience in deploying proof-of-concept and pilots is not the same as selling, deploying and scaling real projects.
Evaluating past performances also requires structured interview techniques which stick to questions that are either relevant to the tasks of the job or to the required industry knowledge. On the soft skills side, questions need to be designed based on past experiences with the aim of predicting good hires by either confirming a culture fit or a behaviour match.
Structured interviews mean that the same set of questions are asked ideally in the same order to all candidates. Depending on the diversity of backgrounds for each role, semi-structured interviews should have a common set of foundation questions and some that are personalised but always relevant to the role. Too often, the reality is that candidates navigate between unstructured sequential interviews, hopping from office to office, with the only aim being to generate an internal consensus.
My recommendation is for fewer but more consistent interviews. Evaluating past performances also requires serious reference checks which can be overlooked when the recruits are processed internally, especially if there is no dedicated talent acquisition team.
The second key determinant of a good hire is the behaviour match of the candidate with the tasks required by the job. The first step to this is to align the internal requirements of the role and clearly define the tasks that the candidate will have to perform. This means a range of behaviour profiles that best fits the job requirements can be defined.
Behaviour assessments provide a clear idea on how each candidate will influence people or events, how they will handle social interaction with others, how consistent and stable they will be at work and how they will conform to rules and structures. If you know where a person falls on that spectrum and what their drivers and needs are at work, it will help to behave how they will perform in the role.
People drive business growth but can easily become your number one stumbling block to achieving it. Understanding what drives them will significantly enhance your hiring process and should also apply to internal referrals.
Nadia Chen is talent engagement director and executive coach at Kurrant Talent
80 per cent of Western managers also say the job is harder than just a few years ago.
Middle managers are burning out and junior employees are more willing to move into expert roles or work as independent contractors, rather than moving up the management ladder. The main reason for this is the rising complexity in business as a result of digital transformations, globalisation, market volatility and the pandemic.
As the business environment becomes more complex, employees spend an increasing amount of time on non-core activities such as providing updates, preparing reports and cross-functional coordination compared to less than one-quarter of their time dealing with clients or teams.
When asked, most employees say they just want to get their job done and solve problems for their clients. In fact, what they enjoy most is a sense of productivity by mastering the tasks at hand. To the contrary, they are telling us that they have the feeling of constantly putting out fires, playing politics and writing reports.
Instead of responding to this complexity by introducing more agility, organisations tend to respond by setting up more rules and processes in a desperate effort to control uncertainty and change. In addition, middle managers often find themselves stuck in the middle of conflicting priorities and an unclear company vision.
In the smart city space, for instance, products need to be well-designed but still affordable; they need to integrate multiple potential features and open-source technologies but be modular and scalable; manufacturing plants need to be further automated but jobs still protected; and team skills need to be upgraded but neither there is often sufficient budget nor time to do so.
Agile ways of working, which are now taking root in non-tech and larger organisations, address what employees dislike about their jobs and enable managers to shift the focus on what employee like and are good at doing. This means that management roles are redesigned taking into consideration each individual’s strengths and motivational drive.
After assessing employees’ behaviour profiles, organisations need to bring together multi-disciplinary teams that are free to pursue different approaches and work towards a clear vision and predefined goals with a start-up mentality.
These people-centered teams are meant to operate around projects, in rapid learning and fast-decision cycles which are enabled by technology and strong alignment around a common purpose. But often there is not enough time and thought spent on defining the exact common purpose. There needs to be a clear differentiation line between the purpose of the project, in other words the outcome expected from the mission or tribes, and the sense of purpose that usually binds the team together.
The outcome of the mission must be defined as short-term and tangible business results or product developments, benchmarked to historical performance data.
One typical trap for an organisation moving to an agile pilot is spending too much time on role modelling new mindsets and implementing new organisational and operational models without clearly defining the desired outcome. In other terms, the “why” are we going through this needs to be crystal clear and is not a team-building purpose.
Instead of top-down hierarchy resulting in detailed instruction and working in silos, agile organisations design teams that are built around end-to-end accountability, focused on action and not on ticking boxes or advancing processes. A stable top-level structure is maintained but much of the traditional hierarchy is replaced by an autonomous and scalable network of teams.
In fact, networks are a natural way to organise efforts because they balance individual freedom with collective coordination. Operation standards are often higher in terms of accountability, alignment, expertise, transparency and collaboration. Roles and people are separate entities meaning that roles can be shared and people can have multiple roles.
For this to work, teams need to be designed around a set of skills required to solve the project’s various problems or full delivery of a service and are cross-functional by nature as well as end-to-end in orientation. They are experimental in essence but nonetheless rigorous in tracking results and staying persistent.
Instead of falling into the reporting and escalating trap, managers need more room to manoeuvre and effectively guide their teams. In an agile organisation, the role of the manager as the boss largely disappears in favour of two distinct leadership roles: the “what” and “how” roles. What should a team be working on and how, if they are to create more value?
The manager becomes a supporting role rather than a coordination or directing role and leads to rich discussions with other team leaders and his teammates about strategy execution and operations. Instead of just passing along orders and controlling, these roles actively build alignment and team engagement by leveraging collective intelligence mostly through informal brainstorming.
The internal network of empowered teams is augmented by an external network of active partnerships to access the best talents and ideas, generate insights and co-create new solutions and services. Therefore, the relationship to clients, service providers or vendors is also redefined in a way that creates more joint value. Co-creation becomes the key word.
Smart city managers
The smart city sector is based on fast-moving IoT technologies and evolving urban infrastructures, putting it at the forefront of the need for management agility. We see our clients building networks of empowered teams with clear, flat structures and hands-on governance. It often starts with one performance-based team that shares its model of success.
The fact that smart cities solution providers are forced into new service models based on outcome and return on investment creates an urgent need to shape, pilot and launch new initiatives and business models in an agile mode.
Agile companies not only enable managers to thrive, they also achieve much higher customer-centricity, faster time to market, higher revenue growth and overall lower operational costs. Employees are more willing to become managers in agile organisations because they can express their entrepreneurial drive, take ownership of team goals and experiment new initiatives.
As people and skills are put at the centre, managers are encouraged to develop new knowledge and skills and know that they can expect role mobility as a result.
Activities most likely to benefit more quickly from agile transformations are the ones around customer-centricity such as innovation, customer experience, sales and servicing or product management. On average across all B2B sectors, less than 50 per cent of employees are currently working in agile mode.
In the smart city sector, as well as related telecom and energy sectors, the level of agile working employees is even lower but momentum is building and will increasingly be associated with business success. Indeed, citizens are becoming cities’ customers and digital and IoT technologies are disrupting ways of working in the public sector by requiring multiple data to be shared and stakeholders to be involved, signaling the end of silos.
You May Also Like…
AI tools and technologies have become game-changers for smart cities and the IoT-driven sectors but their role in...
The rising complexity in business as a result of digital transformations, globalisation, market volatility and the...
The return to work has begun in many cities and regions around the world but employers and managers are having to deal...